Update TSC member details and replacement

[alexlovelltroy]

Replaced Harold Longley with Jay DePasse as TSC member.

[j0hnL]

Welcome, Jay! Looking forward to working with you and continuing to work with Harold on the project.

[rainest]

Arguably better for someone from HPE (ideally @haroldlongley ) to give a ✔️ here too, but as this repo doesn't have merge protections or auto-merge anyway, my approving it is not gonna trigger unexpected confirm and merge.

Welcome @jvd10!

[github-actions]

⏳ Approvals: 3/4 from tsc. Need 1 more.

Approved by: @alexlovelltroy, @haroldlongley, @rainest
Still needed from: @j0hnL, @mdklein, @milliams

_{Team size considered: 6. This comment auto-updates as reviews change.}

[rainest]

Nevermind, we do have automations that work now, and they even suggest relevant approvers (though only in comments, not in the requested approvers).

@j0hnL if you could proper press the ✔️ I think that'll make the bot happy, and then if Harold can as well, 👨‍🍳 👌

[rainest]

@alexlovelltroy minor question on automation stuff--it looks like we currently have merge whenever if humans with permission choose to, and then the Actions bot will merge if it hits the vote threshold?

I think that's the case, I'm just more used to human-selected auto-merge and then native Github merge once required approvals tally.

If I'm right about how automation works here currently--that probably makes more sense for community (whereas code repos have more reason for "no merge til all checks pass/approval requirements met, but auto-merge once they do"): we do want automation on consensus, but with the option to force merge prior if need be.

Don't think anything needs to change, but wasn't 100% sure :)