Skip to content

feature: dynamic tampering shielding KB#276

Draft
m0hamed541 wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
feature/dynamic_tampering_shielding
Draft

feature: dynamic tampering shielding KB#276
m0hamed541 wants to merge 7 commits intomasterfrom
feature/dynamic_tampering_shielding

Conversation

@m0hamed541
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

this PR adds a secure KB : dynamic tampering detection and prevention

@m0hamed541 m0hamed541 self-assigned this Mar 18, 2026
@m0hamed541 m0hamed541 changed the title feature : dynamic tampering shielding KB feature: dynamic tampering shielding KB Mar 18, 2026
@3asm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

3asm commented Mar 18, 2026

@m0hamed541 please fix unit test.

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
The application implements shielding against dynamic tampering.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need also one for when it is missing.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.16%. Comparing base (0637897) to head (8674b09).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #276   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.16%   93.16%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         278      278           
=======================================
  Hits          259      259           
  Misses         19       19           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@3asm 3asm marked this pull request as draft March 19, 2026 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants